Cease-fire status
A pause, not a settlement
The cease-fire still matters because it created room for diplomacy, but the public record points to an extension effort rather than a durable final deal.
Browse this dossier
Short explainer
CurrentFast orientation
Full dossier
→Timeline and evidence
Map room
→Geography and routes
Quick topic guides
Browse all topicsCease-fire dossier
Multi-source knowledge graph
This is a living public dossier on the Iran war and cease-fire story. It brings together reporting, expert interviews, maps, live monitors, and long-form analysis, then organizes the claims so readers can see what experts broadly agree on, where they disagree, and what each source is using as evidence.
Built with Geo's knowledge graph as the database: sources, claims, people, topics, maps, and perspective groups are structured there, then rendered here as a transparent public reader. Open the Geo space.

The geography is the story: Hormuz is narrow enough that routing, insurance, naval pressure, and Iranian coordination rules can change global risk even when the waterway is not formally closed.
Satellite image: NASA Earth Observatory / Landsat 8Updated April 15, 2026
Latest
Start here if you only want the current shape of the story before going deeper into the claims, maps, and source room.
Latest snapshot
Apr 16 readIn simple terms: the shooting has not become a settled peace. Pakistan is still central to mediation, U.S. pressure at sea is still active, Iran is treating shipping and sanctions as bargaining terrain, and Lebanon remains the part of the story most likely to complicate the headline cease-fire.
Cease-fire status
The cease-fire still matters because it created room for diplomacy, but the public record points to an extension effort rather than a durable final deal.
Immediate pressure point
Washington says the maritime blockade is active; Iran is warning that continued pressure on its shipping could break the pause or widen the confrontation.
Still unresolved
Lebanon-related fighting and diplomacy remain difficult to fold into the Iran cease-fire, which is why the regional picture can worsen even if U.S.-Iran talks continue.
Why markets care
The key question is not simply whether ships can pass; it is whether passage is predictable enough for shippers, insurers, energy buyers, and navies to treat the strait as normal again.
The newest layer in the dossier: failed Islamabad talks, a narrower US blockade, simultaneous efforts to extend the ceasefire, an April 22 deadline, and a Lebanon front still being negotiated on a partially separate track.
Claim
The diplomatic opening is still provisional: mediators are pushing an extension in principle before April 22, not announcing a durable second deal.
AP's April 15 report is the clearest anchor here: the current movement is only an in-principle extension to buy time for more diplomacy. Al Jazeera's Pakistan-talk signal strengthens the case that diplomacy is alive, but not yet settled.
Claim
The blockade could deepen the energy shock and trigger another round of escalation if Iran responds by restricting neutral shipping again.
The Economist's strongest addition is not a new legal claim but a market-escalation warning: even a narrower blockade can still hit allied shipping and push oil prices sharply higher if Iran widens the response.
Claim
Washington's Israel-Lebanon talks suggest the Lebanon front is being handled as a connected but separate track rather than a clearly settled part of the Iran ceasefire.
Only the relevant Middle East segment from the April 14 HugoDecrypte bulletin is used here. In clear English, it says the direct talks focused on Israel's northern border and Hezbollah disarmament while Hezbollah denounced them as capitulation.
Claim
The new US measure is narrower than Trump's first rhetoric: ships moving between non-Iranian ports can still transit Hormuz.
A good accessible clarification from the French transcript: this is not the same as a total legal closure of the whole strait, even if it still raises serious enforcement and escalation risks.
Claim
Diplomacy and coercion are now running in parallel: the blockade is active even as mediators try to extend the ceasefire and restart talks.
This is the clearest latest-phase pattern across live coverage: blockade enforcement did not replace diplomacy, it became part of the bargaining environment and stayed in place while extension talks continued.
Claim
After the Islamabad talks failed, Washington shifted to a blockade of Iranian ports and Iranian-linked shipping rather than a full closure of the whole strait.
Cleaned across the French and English explainers: the big shift after April 12 was from ceasefire preservation to a narrower maritime squeeze aimed at Iranian-linked traffic.
Live monitor
A compact market-and-shipping panel pulled from Hormuz Strait Monitor. Use it as a live signal layer, then cross-check interpretation against the sourced claims and maps below.
Live Hormuz monitor
Pulled from Hormuz Strait Monitor and refreshed on the server. Treat it as a live market-and-shipping snapshot alongside the dossier's sourced analysis.
Strait effectively closed to normal commercial shipping. Iran declared closure 'until further notice' after July 12 IRGC attack on GFS Galaxy container ship. 34 ships transited on July 5 vs ~88/day normal. Latest US-Iran military escalation (July 5-13) with 200+ combined strikes suspended diplomatic talks. Southern Omani corridor remains operational but dangerous; northern corridor requires Iranian military coordination.
Ships transiting now
Brent crude oil
Vessels waiting
War risk insurance
Tanker spot rate — VLCC
+140% vs pre-crisis
Pre-crisis: 50 WS · AG-East (TD3C)
Daily throughput (DWT)
18.3% of normal
Diplomacy signal
US-Iran Military Escalation Suspends Hormuz Negotiations; Ceasefire Buckles After Vessel Attacks US-Iran MOU signed June 17 with 60-day ceasefire and Strait reopening provisions is collapsing.
Maps
ISW and the Critical Threats Project have published useful maps, graphs, and visual explainers for this phase of the war. Use this section to see what each graphic explains, then open the original source if you want to inspect it closely.
understandingwar.org maps
understandingwar.org, from ISW and the Critical Threats Project, has published some of the clearest maps and graphs on this phase of the war. This section collects the most useful ones, explains what each visual can help you see, and links back to the original source.

Why it matters: Shows how specific vessels moved around the strait and the Iran-asserted hazardous area.
Open original visual
Why it matters: Helps separate the question "are ships moving?" from the question "who controls acceptable passage?"
Open original visual
Why it matters: Focuses on the traffic most relevant to sanctions, enforcement, and escalation risk.
Open original visual
Why it matters: Shows the trend in Iranian-linked transits before and during the latest blockade phase.
Open original visualInteractive map
ISW also maintains an ArcGIS map of reported U.S. and Israeli strikes. Use it to zoom into the geography directly, or open the original StoryMaps if you want the full map interface.
Timeline
This timeline pulls the live event list from Hormuz Strait Monitor, then adds source chips from the dossier and independent references where available.
Crisis timeline
Events are pulled from Hormuz Strait Monitor, then source chips are added from the dossier corpus and independent references where available. If an item only has the monitor chip, treat it as an event still needing stronger independent corroboration.
Shared ground
Even with sharp disagreement over outcomes, there is still meaningful overlap across reporting and analysis.
Disputes
Most of the disagreement is not about whether a pause exists. It is about what the pause actually means and who came out ahead.
A thematic block for the argument over whether Lebanon is actually covered by the ceasefire or remains outside the deal's effective scope.
Claim
Whether Lebanon is covered by the ceasefire remains unresolved.
Debated scope claim supported by contradictory public positions and continued military activity touching Lebanon.
Claim
The ceasefire is built on zero trust and unresolved bargaining over bases, reparations, and enrichment.
Negotiation-focused claim emphasizing how much remains unsettled behind the headline pause.
Hormuz
Hormuz is where legal language, commercial behavior, and strategic leverage meet.
A thematic block that joins the shipping, energy, and legal arguments around de facto control of the strait.
Claim
Markets reacted faster than shipping confidence returned, so price relief does not mean operational normality.
Business and logistics claim that separates headline market relief from real-world navigation and insurance behavior.
Claim
Iran may control Hormuz in practice without formally closing it by shaping routes near Larak Island.
Operational-control interpretation centered on geography, routing, and how de facto leverage can exist without a formal closure order.
Claim
Charging tolls or imposing coercive coordination in Hormuz would violate trade norms and set a dangerous precedent for transit passage.
Maritime-law claim tied to transit norms in an international strait.
Claim
The Strait of Hormuz carries about a fifth of global seaborne oil and LNG, so transit rules there have global economic consequences.
Factual anchor used throughout the dossier to show why the maritime question matters beyond the immediate war zone.
Perspectives
Each card below answers one plain question: what does this group think is really happening? Open the source button if you want the articles or videos behind the frame.
Who: Andrew Chang, AP, Reuters
What they claim
This reading says the headline pause matters less than the missing details: who is covered, when obligations start, and what 'open Hormuz' actually means.
Specific claim
Whether Lebanon is covered by the ceasefire remains unresolved.
Reader check: Watch the definitions, not only the announcements.
CBC News explainer host; public broadcaster journalism format focused on making fast-moving news legible for a general audience.
"everybody interprets differently"
Who: Michael Clarke, Janice Gross Stein
What they claim
This reading says ships can still move while Tehran shapes routes, approvals, inspections, and risk. The strait can look open but behave like a controlled corridor.
Specific claim
Iran may control Hormuz in practice without formally closing it by shaping routes near Larak Island.
Reader check: Watch ship routes and insurer behavior.
Michael Clarke is a visiting professor in war studies at King's College London and a longtime defense analyst. Janice Gross Stein is the Belzberg Professor of Conflict Management at the University of Toronto and founding director of the Munk School.
"safe passage"
Sources
This is the dossier's browseable source room. Instead of splitting the reference material across separate boxes, it groups the best material by format so you can move from maps to articles to live coverage without hunting around the page.
Videos
Broadcast clips, translated explainers, and analyst segments used in the dossier.
Maps
Strike maps and visual analysis that make the war easier to read geographically.
Reporting
Wire reporting, institutional briefings, and written analysis worth keeping close.
Live coverage
Rolling updates plus neutral wire anchors for fast-changing blockade, diplomacy, and Lebanon claims.
Videos
The core broadcast and YouTube segments behind the dossier's perspective blocks, including French clips that were translated into clean English notes.
Only the Middle East segment is used here. Cleanly translated, it explains the first direct Israel-Lebanon talks in decades, Hezbollah's rejection of them, and why Lebanon still looks like a separate negotiation track.
Open on YouTubeSharp English-language analysis arguing that the blockade may be slower to coerce Iran than Trump expects and could instead widen the oil shock and drag friendly shipping into the dispute.
Open on YouTubeCleanly translated French explainer of the failed Pakistan talks and the narrower US blockade: Washington is targeting ships tied to Iranian ports and coastal waters, not formally shutting the entire strait.
Open on YouTubePublic broadcaster explainer focused on ambiguity, scope, and the meaning of reopening the strait.
Open on YouTubeBusiness and security segment covering markets, mediation, and spoiler risk.
Open on YouTubeAcademic analysis centered on negotiation structure, zero trust, and strategic consequences.
Open on YouTubeCommentary clip used cautiously because the exact speaking voice in the working transcript remains uncertain.
Open on YouTubeHawkish commentary arguing coercive pressure worked and should continue if Iran violates terms.
Open on YouTubeOperational analysis focused on routing, Larak Island, and de facto control of transit.
Open on YouTubeMaps
Use these first if you want geographic orientation: strike placement, blockade geometry, and the map-heavy analysis that frames the wider military picture.

Apr 14, 2026
Map-heavy special report used here for blockade geometry, strike geography, and the wider military picture behind the ceasefire story. It is especially useful because it pairs operational text with linked visuals rather than leaving the reader to infer the geography from headlines.
Open source
Apr 14, 2026
Best single map layer in the dossier for where strikes are landing now. It is used here as a spatial reference rather than a standalone argument.
Open source
Jan 2, 2026
Useful for seeing whether the campaign looks episodic or cumulative over time, which makes it a better tempo reference than a single static daily snapshot.
Open sourceReporting
This is the written backbone of the dossier: AP, Reuters, institutional sources, and longer analysis pieces that stabilize the factual base.
Apr 15, 2026
Best wire anchor for the April 15 diplomatic picture: an extension in principle, Pakistan still in the loop, and April 22 emerging as the next meaningful deadline.
Open source
Apr 15, 2026
Useful for the overlap between blockade enforcement, Lebanon escalation risk, and the claim that the war entered a new but still unstable phase.
Open sourceApr 12, 2026
Wire anchor for the shift from failed Islamabad talks to the US naval blockade posture announced on April 12.
Open source
Apr 8, 2026
Useful for tracking how quickly the pause could fray after the headline agreement.
Open sourceApr 8, 2026
Useful explainer on tolls, transit passage, and why coercive conditions in Hormuz matter globally.
Open sourceApr 8, 2026
Straight news overview of the announced pause, immediate conditions, and follow-on talks.
Open source
Apr 8, 2026
Core wire source for the dispute over whether Lebanon is included in the ceasefire framework.
Open sourceApr 8, 2026
Best reporting anchor for Pakistan's mediation role and the claim that talks were close to collapse.
Open sourceApr 8, 2026
Official U.N. briefing referencing Pakistan and other states that helped facilitate the ceasefire.
Open sourceLive coverage
These are the fast-moving live pages and factual wire anchors worth checking when the story is shifting hour by hour. The list avoids over-weighting one publication when another neutral source can carry the same factual role.

Apr 15, 2026
Useful liveblog anchor for the second-round Pakistan signal, the active blockade posture, and the sense that diplomacy is moving without coercion pausing first.
Open source
Apr 15, 2026
Included as a live-coverage source card for readers who want a mainstream liveblog reference alongside AP and Al Jazeera.
Open sourceApr 9, 2026
Live update useful for tracking how shipping, Lebanon, and immediate escalation signals intersect after the ceasefire headline.
Open source
Apr 8, 2026
Core wire source for the dispute over whether Lebanon is included in the ceasefire framework.
Open sourceWhat next
The cease-fire will be judged less by the headline than by whether real behavior starts to look more stable.